NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Budrodeen v R [2017] NSWCCA 100 Hearing dates: 8 May 2017 Decision date: 19 May 2017 Before: Beazley ACJ at [1]; Adamson J at [52]; Wilson J at [53] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted;
2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against conviction – plea of guilty – integrity of plea – circumstances which will justify setting aside a conviction following a guilty plea – whether such circumstances arose
CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against conviction – destruction of evidence – whether certain CCTV footage was supressed, concealed or destroyed
CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against conviction –entrapment – no defence of entrapment – whether integrity of guilty plea impugned Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 317 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 306C Cases Cited: Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132 R v Chiron [1980] 1 NSWLR 218 R v Cincotta (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 1 November 1996, unreported) R v Davies (1993) 19 MVR 481 R v Ferrer-Esis (1991) 55 A Crim R 231 R v Rae (No 2) (2005) 157 A Crim R 182; [2005] NSWCCA 380 Ridgeway v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19 Sabapathy v R [2008] NSWCCA 82 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam Wayne Budrodeen (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate