NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Skandar (aka Makari) v BSM Group Pty Ltd (as trustee for the BSM Discretionary Trust) [2017] NSWSC 610 Hearing dates: 25 August 2016 Date of orders: 18 May 2017 Decision date: 18 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: Parties to be heard further on course to be adopted in light of the reasons Catchwords: CROSS-VESTING – loan from family trust to beneficiary's spouse during marriage – trustee sues for debt in District Court – Family Court proceedings underway – trustee raises real question of jurisdiction of Family Court to deal with the debt to it – s 90AB of Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) considered – Family Court has jurisdiction to hear debt claim but issue not without doubt – in circumstances not appropriate to transfer – alternative steps, given real possibility of inconsistent verdicts, were to stay District Court proceedings or transfer Family Court proceedings to Supreme Court – parties to be heard further Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) Cases Cited: Adamson v West Perth Football Club (Inc) (1979) 39 FLR 199; [1979] FCA 122 BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz (2004) 221 CLR 400; [2004] HCA 61 Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570; [1983] HCA 12 Kennedy v Australasian Coal & Shale Employees Federation (1983) 78 FLR 252; [1983] FCA 325 Philip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd; United States Surgical Corp v Hospital Products International Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 457; [1981] HCA 7 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511; [1999] HCA 27 Stack v Coast Securities (No 9) Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 261; [1983] HCA 36 Valceski v Valceski (2007) 70 NSWLR 36; [2007] NSWSC 440 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marcha Skandar (aka Makari) (Plaintiff) BSM Group Pty Ltd (as trustee for the BSM Discretionary Trust) (First Defendant) Bakous Makari (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Reeves (Plaintiff) E Finnane (First Defendant) Submitting appearance (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate