NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kautoga v R [2017] NSWCCA 107 Hearing dates: 8 May 2017 Date of orders: 24 May 2017 Decision date: 24 May 2017 Before: Beazley ACJ [1]; Adamson J [2]; Wilson J [35] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against interlocutory judgment – refusal by trial judge to sever indictment – use of coincidence and tendency evidence – whether risk of prejudice to applicant arising from evidence inadmissible for one purpose but admissible for another can be ameliorated by jury directions – where trial judge finds it is in interests of justice for counts on indictment to be tried together – whether trial judge made an error in exercise of discretion – HELD –appeal dismissed – no error in decision to refuse application for separate trials and for severance of indictment Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F(3)(a) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 21, 21(2), 29, 29(1)(c), 29(3) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 97, 98, 101, 101(2), 137 Cases Cited: DAO v The Queen (2011) 81 NSWLR 568; [2011] NSWCCA 63 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v Gale; R v Duckworth (2012) 217 A Crim R 487; [2012] NSWCCA 174 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ratu Pio Kautoga (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G James QC (Applicant) T Smith (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate