NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Christopher Sheehy v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force; Steven Rapisarda v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force; Christian McDonald v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force; Shane Housego v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 163 Hearing dates: 19 May 2017 Date of orders: 19 May 2017 Decision date: 19 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: 1.The applicants have not expressly confined the scope of their applications.
2. Direct that the applicants serve on the respondents a letter containing the grounds of their applications by 26 May 2017.
3. Direct that the matter be listed for a planning meeting on 20 June 2017 at 12 noon. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Government information – burden of proof to justify decision - obligation to clarify scope of application
PROCEDURE - Planning meeting – whether applicants expressly confined the scope of their applications at the planning meeting Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 ss 5, 14, 105, Clause 1 of Schedule 1 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 s 36 Police Act 1990 s 169A Cases Cited: CCB v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAD 145 Fuchs v Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAD 198 Fuchs v Commissioner of Police (No. 2) [2017] NSWCATAD 92 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Christopher Sheehy (Applicant 2016/00378368) Steven Rapisarda (Applicant 2016/00378369) Christian McDonald (Applicant 2016/00378371) Shane Housego (Applicant 2016/00378372) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Eurell (Applicants) Mr M Seck (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate