NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Miskoski v Sutherland Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1252 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference 23 May 2017 Date of orders: 24 May 2017 Decision date: 24 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: dual occupancy; addition of roof top service area; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Slobodan Miskoski (First Applicant) Natalie Trajceski (Second Applicant) Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Bartier Perry (Applicants) Janelle Maree Amy, Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/34117 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The appeal is upheld 2. The Applicant is granted leave to amend Modification Application No. MA16/0425 and to rely upon the following amended plans, a copy of which is attached as Annexure "A": Drawing No. Drawing Name Prepared by Date SH01, Rev F Site Plan JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH02, Rev F Lower Ground JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH03, Rev F Ground Floor Plan JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH04, Rev F First Floor JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH05, Rev F Roof Plan JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH06, Rev F West Elevation JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH07, Rev F North Elevation JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH08, Rev F South Elevation JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH09, Rev F East Elevation JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH10, Rev F Section AA JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH11, Rev F Section BB JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH12, Rev F Section CC JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH13, Rev F Section DD JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH14, Rev F Schedules JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH15, Rev F Construction Management JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH16, Rev F Perspective JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH17, Rev F Perspective JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH18, Rev F Strata Plan JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH19, Rev F Shadow Diagram JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH20, Rev F FSR Calculation JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH21, Rev F Concept Landscape Plan JIH Building Designs 10 April 2017 SH22, Rev F First Floor Footprint Calculations JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017 SH23, Rev F Service Rood Perspective JIH Building Designs 22 May 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate