NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Shelton [2017] NSWDC 115 Hearing dates: 4 May 2017 Date of orders: 04 May 2017 Decision date: 04 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Defendant called outside Court 13D three times at 10:45am – no appearance (note defendant also called outside Court 16A three times at 9:30am – no appearance). (2) Grant leave to the plaintiff to replace Annexure B to the Affidavit of Mr Stephen Bird with the correct document in 7 days. (3) Pursuant to r 17.7 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), enter judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $622,711.19, plus interest of $28,124.37, making a total of $650,835.56. (4) Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs. (5) Exhibits retain for 28 days. (6) A copy of this judgment is to be taken out by the plaintiff and served on the defendant within 7 days of the judgment in final form being made available to the plaintiff. Catchwords: TAXATION – an application for judgment for a tax-related liability due to the Commonwealth payable to the Commissioner of Taxation – defendant fails to plead any substantive defence, file evidence or appear – application for summary judgment under r 17.7 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) for judgment on admissions Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56 – 62 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), ss 255-45, 255-50 and 269-20 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 17.7 and 29.7 Cases Cited: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Broadbeach Properties Pty Ltd (2008) 237 CLR 473 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Epov [2008] NSWSC 1085 Frinty v Landmax Developments Pty Ltd (2010) 272 ALR 412 Ghosh v NineMSN Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 334 Kolichis v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2014] WASCA 76 Moon v Mun [2013] NSWCA 217 Satz v ACN 069 808 957 Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 365 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation Defendant: Brett Shelton Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr J Mitchell Defendant: No appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate