NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Abbey v R [2017] NSWCCA 109 Hearing dates: 10 May 2017 Decision date: 29 May 2017 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Adamson J at [64]; Wilson J at [65] Decision: 1. Grant leave in respect of ground 3, and otherwise refuse leave. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – sexual assault – Crown case largely based on testimonial evidence of complainant of numerous assaults – inconsistent verdicts – jury convicted on three counts and acquitted on remaining counts – one of the counts of which appellant was acquitted was alleged to have occurred on same occasion as two on which he was convicted – whether acceptable explanation for the differentiation as a matter of logic and reasonableness – other evidence in Crown case corroborated the counts on which the applicant was convicted – whether trial judge erred in admitting evidence that appellant had admitted to some (unspecified) charges brought against him – whether trial judge failed adequately to direct jury – appeal dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – whether sentence manifestly excessive – challenge confined to term of non-parole period – no error established Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 28A, 44, 53A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61J, 61O, 578A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 137 Cases Cited: Greenhalgh v R [2017] NSWCCA 94 Lepine v R [2017] NSWCCA 83 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 McCann v R [2014] NSWCCA 79 Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335; (2013) 237 A Crim R 238 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704; [2001] NSWCCA 534 Selby v R [2017] NSWCCA 40 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Abbey (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: W T McMillan (Applicant) N Williams (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate