NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Neale v NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure [2017] NSWLEC 61 Hearing dates: 18 April 2017 Date of orders: 25 May 2017 Decision date: 25 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: (1) The Respondent's Notice of Motion dated 16 December 2016 is upheld. (2) The Applicant's proceedings are dismissed. (3) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs from 19 December 2014. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – exercise of discretion on application for leave to amend pleadings introducing causes of action over which court has no jurisdiction – leave not granted – proceedings dismissed – costs considered Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 ss 64, 65, 149A, 149B, 149C, 149D, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Part 3A Limitation Act 1969 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 12.4, 12.10, 13.4, 42.7, 42.20 Cases Cited: Brett Stephen Lord and Marcus William Ayres v The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2014] NSWLEC 1268 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: James Woodward Neale (Applicant) NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: T Hall, solicitor (Applicant) L Sims, solicitor (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Hall Partners Pty Ltd (Applicant) NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure (Respondent) File Number(s): 16/152547
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate