NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Al Saadi v R [2017] NSWCCA 110 Hearing dates: 17 March 2017 Decision date: 26 May 2017 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Latham J at [2]; Campbell J at [29] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - whether the sentencing judge failed to give an adequate discount for the plea - whether the sentence was disproportionate to the applicant's role in the offence - whether the judge erred in assessing the objective seriousness of the offending - leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 86 Crimes (Sentencing Procedures) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 22, 23 Cases Cited: R v Thompson and Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Dib [2003] NSWCCA 117 R v Robert Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 197 A Crim R 1 R v Stambolis [2006] NSWCCA 56; (2006) 160 A Crim R 580 R v Cartwright (1989) 11 NSWLR 243 R v XX [2017] NSWCCA 90 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mohammad Bara Al-Saadi (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: A Radojev (Applicant) S Hughes (Crown)
Solicitors: Harb Lawyers (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/189604 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 16 September 2016 Before: Culver DCJ File Number(s): 2014/189604
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate