NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Troy Douglas Pleace v R [2017] NSWCCA 112 Hearing dates: 28 April 2017 Date of orders: 31 May 2017 Decision date: 31 May 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Fullerton J at [2] Hamill J at [3] Decision: Application for leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – enter with intent to commit offence of intimidation – assault occasioning actual bodily harm – assault with crow bar in victim's home – whether sentence manifestly excessive – where applicant suffering severe psychiatric condition – schizophrenia -– relevance of statistics and outcomes in other cases – sentence high but not plainly wrong or unjust Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Betts v The Queen [2016] HCA 25 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Dyer v R [2011] NSWCCA 185 Kennedy v R [2013] NSWCCA 19 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; 118 A Crim R 66 R v Mitropoulos [2004] NSWCCA 402 R v Togher [2012] NSWDC 276 Sabongi v R [2015] NSWCCA 25 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Troy Douglas Pleace - Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Ms K Stares -Applicant Mr S Hughes – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate