NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McKenzie v New South Wales [2017] NSWSC 661 Hearing dates: 24 April 2017 Date of orders: 24 April 2017 Decision date: 24 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Parker J Decision: Proceedings dismissed Catchwords: CONTRACTS – offer and acceptance – inaction by offeree – consideration – summary judgment EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL – promissory estoppel – promise by silence – detrimental reliance – summary judgment COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION – use of waters of rivers for conservation or irrigation - no action by Commonwealth government – summary judgment Legislation Cited: Commonwealth Constitution, s 100 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 63 Water Management Act 2000 (NSW), ss 329, 335, 336A, 336C Cases Cited: Munday v Gill (1930) 44 CLR 38 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387; [1988] HCA 7 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hugh Malcolm Roy McKenzie (First Plaintiff) Kerrie Lee McKenzie (Second Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (First Defendant) Tracey Lawson, personally and acting as Regional Manager, Water Regulation North/North Coast (Second Defendant) Representation: First Plaintiff in person
Counsel: R Horsley (Defendants)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Defendants) File Number(s): 2016/326851 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate