NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: GPO Atrium Café Pty Ltd v Martin Heritage Management Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 670 Hearing dates: 15 May 2017 Date of orders: 15 May 2017 Decision date: 15 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Leave to discontinue given on terms. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – discontinuance on terms – plaintiffs seek leave to discontinue proceedings – where plaintiffs brought substantially similar claims in earlier proceedings – earlier proceedings settled by deed of release – whether plaintiffs should not be permitted to commence further proceedings raising same claims – leave to discontinue granted on conditions Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 12.1 Cases Cited: C2C Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 644 Heartlink Ltd v Jones (2007) WAR 190; [2007] WASC 254 Levy v Bablis [2009] NSWSC 740 Trade Practices Commission v Manfal Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 382 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: GPO Atrium Café Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) GPO Intermezzo Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) GPO Sydney Administration Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) No. 1 Maximus Pty Ltd (Fourth Plaintiff) No. 1 Intermezzo Pty Ltd (Fifth Plaintiff) Martin Heritage Management Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Ausco Martin Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr L Byrne (Plaintiffs) Mr D H Mitchell (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate