Greg Boyce v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1268

Land and Environment Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Greg Boyce v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1268 Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference 8 and 29 March and 27 April 2017 Date of orders: 29 May 2017 Decision date: 29 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: demolition of existing structures and construction of a 6 storey boarding house - conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Greg Boyce (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr M Staunton, barrister (Applicant) Ms J Hewitt, solicitor (Respondent)

Solicitors: -(Applicant) HWL Ebsworth (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/355673 Publication restriction: No

Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application DA. DA201600529 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a 6 storey boarding house containing 48 rooms for lodgers and 3 on-site manager's accommodation rooms with associated carparking for 12 cars at 22 Fisher Street, Petersham. 2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 3. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 5. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the following amended plans / documents: 1. The following architectural plans prepared by Tank and dated 9 April 2017 set out in the below table 100 Issue C Basements 1 & 2 9/4/17 Tank 120 Issue E Ground Floor Plans 9/4/17 Tank 130 Issue D Plans Level 1 and 2 9/4/17 Tank 140 Issue D Plans Level 3 & 4 9/4/17 Tank 150 Issue D Plans Level 5 9/4/17 Tank 160 Issue D Roof Plans and 3D view 9/4/17 Tank 200 Issue C Fisher St Elevation Schedule of Finishes 9/4/17 Tank 201 Issue D Fozzard Lane Elevation Section A 9/4/17 Tank 202 Issue C Eastern Elevation & 3 D views 9/4/17 Tank 203 Issue D Western Elevation & 3D views 9/4/17 Tank 204 Issue C Section B 9/4/17 Tank 600 Issue B Typical Bulkhead Layout 17/3/17 Tank 601 Issue C Western Façade Details 9/4/17 Tank 300 Issue B FSR Calculations 25/4/17 Tank