NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Create Business Australia Pty Ltd v AURFS Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 680 Hearing dates: 26 May 2017 Decision date: 31 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Ball J Decision: See paragraph [39] of this judgment Catchwords: INJUNCTIONS – interlocutory injunction – whether interlocutory injunction should be granted – whether serious question to be tried – whether balance of convenience favours granting of injunction. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory injunctions – undertakings – whether onus lies with the defendant to persuade the court that an interlocutory inunction should be ordered – whether onus is on the defendant to persuade the court that they should be released from undertaking Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) s 4 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 Carlton and United Breweries (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bond Brewing New South Wales Ltd (1987) 76 ALR 633 Uber BV v Howarth (Supreme Court (NSW), 21 December 2015 unreported) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Create Business Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) AURFS Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Deanna Leigh Mannix (Second Defendant) Ben William Mannix (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: SA Lawrance (Plaintiff) MA McCall (Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate