NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vinci v Ku-ring-gai Council [2017] NSWLEC 1280 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1 June 2017 Date of orders: 02 June 2017 Decision date: 02 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bernadette Annette Vinci (Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Gough solicitor.(Applicant) Ms C. Morton solicitor (Respondent)
Solicitors: Storey & Gough Lawyers (Applicant) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/38771
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders. 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. Development Application No. DA0561/16 for the demolition of an existing dwelling and the construction of a new two storey dwelling containing four bedrooms and a double garage, swimming pool and associated landscaping, retaining walls and cabana within a heritage conservation area at 9 Burns Road, Wahroonga, is approved, subject to the conditions in Annexure A. 3. The Applicant is to pay costs, pursuant to s 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, in the sum of one dollar ($1). ……………. Commissioner O'Neill 38771.17 O'Neill (C) (488 KB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 02 June 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate