NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shi v R [2017] NSWCCA 126 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 08 June 2017 Decision date: 08 June 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL; Harrison J and Bellew J at [1] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Allow the appeal. 3. Remit the proceedings to the District Court of New South Wales for sentence according to law. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – application for leave to appeal against sentence – where sentencing proceedings miscarried due to a procedural irregularity – where appropriate that the applicant be sentenced in that Court according to law – matter remitted to the District Court for sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code 1995 Customs Act 1901 Cases Cited: Betts v The Queen (2016) 90 ALJR 758; [2016] HCA 25 Burbridge v R [2016] NSWCCA 128 Payda v R [2013] NSWCCA 109 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Xiongjie Shi (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M C Ramage QC (Applicant) W Abraham QC with A Avery-Williams (Respondent)
Solicitors: Jeffreys Lawyers (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/237819 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 19 June 2015 Before: King SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/237819
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate