NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barwick v Shetab [2017] NSWCATAP 127 Hearing dates: 21 April 2017 Date of orders: 07 June 2017 Decision date: 07 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: D Cowdroy ADCJ, QC, Principal Member K Rosser, Principal Member Decision: The appeal is dismissed Catchwords: Appeal – Whether work residential building work – assessment of damages Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law (NSW) 2010 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Fair Trading Act 1987 Home Building Act 1989 Cases Cited: Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSW LR 139 Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Tabcorp Holdings Pty Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 236 CLR 272 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Grant Barwick (Appellant) Mahsid Shetab (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Dr E Peden (Appellant) Self-represented respondent File Number(s): AP 17/04696 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 07 December 2016 Before: D Moss, General Member File Number(s): HB 16/31247
reasons for decision
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate