NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Evans (No 1) [2017] NSWSC 741 Hearing dates: 10 April 2017 Decision date: 04 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Tendency and coincidence evidence admissible Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – tendency evidence pursuant to Evidence Act 1995, s 97 – coincidence evidence pursuant to Evidence Act 1995, s 98 – allegation of two home invasions committed a month apart – charges of murder, specially aggravated break, enter and steal – aggravated detain for advantage – substantial similarities between two incidents – principal fact in issue whether accused present at both – no concession that joint criminal enterprises proved nor mental elements of offences established – evidence capable of having significant probative value on both bases – risk of unfair prejudice outweighed – evidence admissible on both bases Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 143 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 55, 97, 101(2) Cases Cited: Aravena v R [2015] NSWCCA 288 Elomar v R; Hasan v R; Cheikho v R; Jamal v R [2014] NSWCCA 303 Hughes v R [2015] NSWCCA 330 R v Matonwal & Amood [2016] NSWCCA 174 Saoud v R [2014] NSWCCA 136; 87 NSWLR 481 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Ryan David Evans Representation: Counsel: Mr C Maxwell QC (Crown) Mr R Webb (Accused)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions Criminal Defence Group File Number(s): 2014/309094
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate