NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Agnihotri v Penrith City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1298 Hearing dates: 1 June 2017 Date of orders: 08 June 2017 Decision date: 08 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Martin SC Decision: (1) Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on amended plan drawing 2A dated 31 March 2017. (2) The appeal is dismissed. (3) DA 15/1250.01 for the retention of an existing dwelling and the construction of a three bedroom, two storey detached dual occupancy dwelling at 15 O'Connell Street, Kingswood, is determined by refusal. (4) The Exhibits are returned, other than Exhibit C. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL – residential development - dual occupancy - setback – building design Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 79C(1); 82A; 97B(1) and (2) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 34AA Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 7.7 Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 Penrith Development Control Plan 2014 Cases Cited: Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167 (2001) 115 LGERA 373 at [75] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Satya Agnihotri (Applicant) Penrith City Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr Obradovik (Agent for Applicant) Mr Drury (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Self-represented (Applicant) Sparke Helmore (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/35401 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate