NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tran v Vo [2017] NSWCA 134 Hearing dates: 28 April 2017 Decision date: 15 June 2017 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Payne JA at [7]. Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) Appellants to pay respondent's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: WORKERS COMPENSATION – employer injured by sugarcane juicing machine while visiting work premises on rostered day off – successful claim for occupiers liability – whether employee's injury in course of employment – injury occurred during an interval – whether employer induced or encouraged the employee to spend the interval at a particular place or perform a particular activity – whether employee's injury arose out of employment – whether a causal connection established between the injury and the respondent's employment – payments by workers compensation insurer in respect of the injury – undertaking to repay workers compensation – whether double compensation Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: 2 Elizabeth Bay Road Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 73943 (2014) 88 NSWLR 488; [2014] NSWCA 409 Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479; [1987] HCA 7 Badawi v Nexon Asia Pacific Pty Limited trading as Commander Australia Pty Limited (2009) 75 NSWLR 503; [2009] NSWCA 324 Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd v Gordon (2006) 225 CLR 364; [2006] HCA 32 Clancy v Department of Public Health [1962] NSWR 2 Comcare v PVYW (2013) 250 CLR 246; [2013] HCA 41 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353; [1992] HCA 48 European Bank Ltd v Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates (2010) 240 CLR 432; [2010] HCA 6 Franklins Self Serve Pty Ltd v Wyber (1999) 48 NSWLR 249; [1999] NSWCA 390 Hatzimanolis v ANI Corporation Ltd (1992) 173 CLR 473; [1992] HCA 21 Lawrence v George Matthews (1924) Limited [1929] 1 KB 1 Pioneer Studios Pty Ltd v Hills [2012] NSWCA 324 Smith v The Australian Woollen Mills Ltd (1933) 50 CLR 504; [1933] HCA 60 Stewart v Metropolitan Water, Sewerage and Drainage Board (1932) 48 CLR 216; [1932] HCA 45 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418; [1950] HCA 35 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315; [2003] HCA 57 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 422; [2005] HCA 62 Vo v Tran (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1198 Vo v Tran (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 1199 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hung Vien Tran (First Appellant) Thuy My Le (Second Appellant) Thi Ngoc Hien Vo (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Polin SC (Appellants) H Marshall SC and D E Baran (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate