NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stylianou v Director of Public Prosecutions [2017] NSWSC 766 Hearing dates: 27 February 2017 Decision date: 14 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – committal proceedings – application for review of Magistrate's decision refusing to direct witnesses to attend to give oral evidence –where plaintiff sought to explore admissibility of covert recordings – whether Magistrate misconceived the extent of his authority to allow that course – where plaintiff sought to explore mental health and behaviour of complainant – whether Magistrate constructively failed to exercise jurisdiction Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 66A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Ch 3 Pt 2, ss 64, 65, 66, 70, 91, 93 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 90 Cases Cited: Kant v Director of Public Prosecutions (1994) 34 NSWLR 216 Losurdo v Director of Public Prosecutions (1998) 101 A Crim R 162; [1998] NSWSC 16 R v DRF [2015] NSWCCA 181 R v Kennedy (1997) 94 A Crim R 341 Sim v Magistrate Corbett [2006] NSWSC 665 Thompson v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] NSWSC 522 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Constantinos Stylianou (plaintiff) Director of Public Prosecutions (first defendant) Local Court of New South Wales (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: H Dhanji SC, M Burke (plaintiff) M Smith (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate