NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: UGL Rail Pty Limited v Trox (Australia) Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 770 Hearing dates: 15/05/2017; 16/05/2017; 22/05/2017; 24/05/2017 Date of orders: 15 June 2017 Decision date: 15 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: McDougall J Decision: Proceedings dismissed with costs. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – whether sound attenuators designed and supplied by the defendant for the Lane Cove Tunnel Project were defective – BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – whether UGLR instructed Trox to repair, modify, replace and/or provide again the defective attenuators – where notices given to Trox were ineffective – CONTRACT – whether UGLR is entitled to recover damages – where Alstom subcontracted to Trox responsibility to design and supply the sound attenuators (Trox subcontract) – where Alstom sold its "Business" and all "Contracts" relating to it to UGLR (Sale contract) – whether Alstom appointed UGLR to be its agent for the purpose of administering and performing the Trox subcontract – whether UGLR had implied actual authority to administer and perform the Trox subcontract – whether UGLR's conduct was ratified by a deed of assignment – whether Alstom became a trustee of its rights under the Trox subcontract for the benefit of UGLR – CONTRACT – whether after completion of Sale contract Alstom suffered loss compensable in damages by reason of the defects – CONTRACT – whether UGLR incurred costs and expenses – where works were done by related companies – where UGLR has no obligation in relation to the costs and expenses incurred by those companies Cases Cited: Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 604 Bartlett v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 92 NSWLR 639 Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253 Equiticorp Finance Ltd (In Liq) v Bank of New Zealand (1993) 32 NSWLR 50 at 134 (1993) 32 NSWLR 50 Jessup v Queensland Housing Commission [2002] 2 Qd R 270 In Re Schebsman; Ex parte Official Receiver v Cargo Superintendents (London) Ltd [1944] Ch 83 Korda v Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd (2015) 255 CLR 62 Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251; Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 236 CLR 272 Wiki v Atlantis Relocations (NSW) Pty Ltd (2004) 60 NSWLR 127 Category: Principal judgment Parties: UGL Rail Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Trox (Australia) Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Ashhurst SC / S Docker (Plaintiff) CRC Newlinds SC / C McMeniman (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate