NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Springfield v Duncombe [2017] NSWCA 137 Hearing dates: 6 June 2017 Decision date: 16 June 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Emmett AJA at [21]; Adamson J at [33] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed.
2. Order the appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: TORTS – appeal – negligence – duty of care – liability – whether causation could be concluded from higher risk of harm that appellant fell from stairs rather than landing – no evidence from which it could be inferred that appellant fell from stairs – HELD – no error in trial judge's factual findings or conclusions Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5D, 5E, 5M, 32 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Cases Cited: Bendix Mintex Pty Ltd v Barnes (1997) 42 NSWLR 307 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Hoffmann v Boland [2013] Aust Torts Reports 82-134; [2013] NSWCA 158 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 Melbourne City Investments Pty Ltd v UGL Ltd [2017] VSCA 128 Roads and Traffic Authority v Royal (2008) 82 ALJR 870; [2008] HCA 19 Robinson Helicopter Company Inc v McDermott (2016) 90 ALJR 679; [2016] HCA 22 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531 Texts Cited: Buckland, "The Duty to Take Care", (1935) 51 LQR 637 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gemma Springfield (by her tutor David Springfield) (Appellant) Paula Frances Duncombe (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Sheldon/E Welsh (Appellant) P Morris SC/N Ghabar (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate