NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Viljoen v Hayes [2017] NSWSC 801 Hearing dates: 2 June 2017 Date of orders: 21 June 2017 Decision date: 21 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: Civil Procedure – request for information from estate – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 54.3(3) – inherent jurisdiction – executor de son tort – applicant's interest in estate adeemed – proper administration of trust or estate – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 5.3(1) – discovery in advance of family provision claim – statutory eligibility to make claim – strength of putative claim – relevance of documents potentially demonstrating existence of notional estate or claims available to estate – no evidence of applicant's financial circumstances – "may be entitled to make a claim for relief" Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 57-60, 80 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 5.3(1), 54.3(3) Cases Cited: Gonzales v Claridades (2003) 58 NSWLR 211; [2003] NSWCA 227 Hartigan Nominees Pty Ltd v Rydge (1992) 29 NSWLR 405 Hatfield v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2010) 77 NSWLR 506; [2010] NSWCA 69 Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 1; [1999] FCA 1584 Morton v Nylex Ltd [2007] NSWSC 562 Panasonic Australia Pty Ltd v Ngage Pty Ltd (2006) 69 IPR 595; [2006] NSWSC 399 St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd (2004) 211 ALR 147; [2004] FCA 1360 Texts Cited: RP Austin, 'Constructive Trusts' in PD Finn, Essays in Equity (1985, Law Book Company) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marilyn Viljoen (Plaintiff) Gregory Hayes (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: MJ Heath (Plaintiff) T Catanzariti (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate