NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: D151, D152, D154 v New South Wales Crime Commission [2017] NSWCA 143 Hearing dates: 24 February 2017 Decision date: 21 June 2017 Before: Beazley ACJ at [1]; Basten JA at [2]; Simpson JA at [43] Decision: Q1. Upon its proper construction, does s 35A of the Crime Commission Act 2012 (NSW) ("Act") confer a power upon the Supreme Court to grant leave to the New South Wales Crime Commission to take evidence from a person who is the subject of a current charge against the laws of the Commonwealth?
Answer: Yes.
Q2. If yes, is s 35A of the Act invalid to that extent, on the ground that to permit such leave to be granted in those circumstances:
(a) would contravene Ch III of the Constitution by reason that it would purport to authorize a contempt of a State court exercising federal criminal jurisdiction thereby impairing the institutional integrity of that court as a repository of judicial power of the Commonwealth; or
(b) would contravene Ch III of the Constitution by reason that it would be an impermissible interference with:
(i) essential features of the judicial power of the Commonwealth, namely the accusatorial nature of a criminal trial (as considered in X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92); or
(c) would contravene s 80 of the Constitution by reason that it would be an impermissible alteration of fundamental features of 'trial … by jury' on an indictment for an offence against a law of the Commonwealth?
Answer: No.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate