NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wordsworth v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWCATAD 201 Hearing dates: 12 May 2017 Date of orders: 21 June 2017 Decision date: 21 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: 1.The decision under review is affirmed. 2. The publication or disclosure to the Applicant or the public of the paragraphs in these reasons identified as '[not for publication]' is prohibited under s 64(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Government information – - overriding public interest against disclosure - whether disclosure could reasonably be expected to endanger or prejudice a system or procedure for protecting property – whether disclosure could reasonably be expected to facilitate a terrorist attack Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 s 64(1) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 ss 14 cl 2(e) and (f), 58(1)(d), 107(1) and (2) Terrorism (Police Powers) Act 2002 Cases Cited: Cui v Leichhardt Council [2006] NSWADT 298 Electoral Commissioner, State Electoral Office v McCabe (GD) [2003] NSWADTAP 28 Hutchinson v Roads and Traffic Authority, NSW [2006] NSWADT 147 Smith v Pittwater Council [2016] NSWCATAD 67 Attorney General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Roads and Maritime Services Matt Wordsworth Representation: Counsel: Mr N J Williams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate