NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v R [2017] NSWCCA 145 Hearing dates: 5 May 2017 Decision date: 23 June 2017 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Adamson J at [51]; Campbell J at [55] Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against conviction – applicant acquitted of sexual intercourse without consent in circumstances of aggravation contrary to s 61J(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) but convicted of the statutory alternative of attempt to commit that offence contrary to s 61P – some evidence of complainant referred to an attempt only while other parts of her evidence referred to penetration – whether verdicts inconsistent – whether verdicts the result of an impermissible compromise – verdicts able to be reconciled on a logical and reasonable basis Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61J, 61P Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439; [1997] HCA 12 Holloway v R [2017] NSWCCA 17 Mackenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 MG v R [2017] NSWCCA 14 R v TK (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 Stinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 191 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Van Chien Nguyen (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Fernandez (Applicant) N J Adams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate