NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Owners Corporation Strata Plan 76841 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 140 Hearing dates: 7 June 2017 Decision date: 23 June 2017 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Simpson JA at [50] Decision: 1. Direct the applicant to cause that the orders of Stevenson J made on 2 November 2016 in proceedings SC 2014/58603 be entered into the computerised court record system. 2. Grant leave to the applicant to appeal from the orders of Stevenson J made on 2 November 2016, but only in respect of the second of those orders and on proposed ground 3. 3. Direct the applicant to file a notice of appeal limited to that ground 3. 4. Allow the applicant's appeal from the second of the orders made by Stevenson J on 2 November 2016. 5. Set aside the order made on 2 November 2016 that the applicant have leave to amend the Fire and BCA Defects claim on condition that the claim for those defects is limited to $195,000. 6. Otherwise dismiss the applicant's summons for leave to appeal. 7. Dismiss the respondents' cross-summons for leave to appeal. 8. Amend order 2 made by Stevenson J on 14 December 2016 by adding as (d) the following: (d) Delete the words "to the extent allowed pursuant to the judgment of Stevenson J on 2 November 2016" in paras A6 and C25. 9. Make no order as to the costs of the applicant's summons, the appeal or the respondents' cross-summons. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – uniform civil procedure – amendment application – where proceeding transferred from District Court to Supreme Court – where by filing of Technology and Construction List Statement application made to amend pleading to add additional claim – whether sufficient prejudice to refuse amendment from loss of viable and realistic cross-claims against third parties – whether basis for imposing monetary limits on existing pleaded claims – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 61(3), 140(1), 143(1)(a) District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 44 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 109ZK Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), Pt 2C Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.4(3), 45.7 Cases Cited: House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Owners Corporation Strata Plan 76841 (Applicant) Ceerose Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Prisand Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Sirtes SC and P Bambagiotti (Applicant) IA Roberts SC and M Sheldon (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate