NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gooley & Ors v Breda Pty Ltd & Ors [2017] NSWSC 817 Hearing dates: 8 February 2017 Date of orders: 22 June 2017 Decision date: 22 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Orders for preliminary discovery made under UCPR, r 5.3 in several of the categories sought. Directions made for the bringing in of short minutes of order and the disposition of any outstanding costs issues. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for preliminary discovery under UCPR, r 5.3 – family companies – plaintiffs shareholders in, but not current directors of, several family companies holding substantial real estate – whether plaintiffs entitled to an order for preliminary discovery - whether plaintiffs have already decided to commence proceedings – whether plaintiffs' case was weak and whether its alleged weakness is a relevant consideration in the exercise of the Court's discretion to order preliminary discovery – whether sufficient evidence adduced of the plaintiffs' potential causes of action to ground UCPR, r 5.3 relief. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act, ss 56, 57 and 58 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), 247A Guardianship Act, Part 3A, s 25E NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 Real Property Act 1900 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 5.2, 5.3 Cases Cited: Hatfield v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2010) 77 NSWLR 506 Lahoud v Hooper (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1405 Morton v Nylex [2007] NSWSC 562 Pritchard Lees Pty Ltd v Cathleen Heather [2013] NSWSC 1521 Re Motasea Pty Ltd (2014) 97 ACSR 589 St George Bank Limited v Rabo Australia Ltd (2004) 211 ALR 147 The Age Company Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268 Yes Family Pty Ltd v Sphere Healthcare Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 917 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: First Plaintiff: Brett Raymond Gooley Second Plaintiff: Finbob Pty Ltd ACN 003 945 480, as trustee for the KB Trust Third Plaintiff: Janine Ruth Gooley First Defendant: Breda Pty Ltd ACN 000 399 002 Second Defendant: Decahill Pty Ltd ACN 003 753 713 Third Defendant: Dama Enterprises Pty Ltd ACN 000 604 071 Fourth Defendant: Barton Press Pty Ltd 000 891 976 Fifth Defendant: Goold Enterprises Pty Ltd 01 339 546 Sixth Defendant: Melville William Gooley, by his tutoras Melinda Louise Foley & Aleta Joy Gooley Seventh Defendant: Melinda Louise Foley Eighth Defendant: Aleta Joy Gooley, also known as Aleta Joy Kinsella Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate