NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lord v McMahon (No. 5) [2017] NSWSC 819 Hearing dates: 7 March 2017 Date of orders: 03 July 2017 Decision date: 03 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Global costs order made in respect of all issues in the proceedings. Defendant ordered to pay 40% of the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: COSTS – plaintiff partially successful in action for nuisance and trespass – defendant/cross-claimant unsuccessful on Cross-Claim for proprietary estoppel and for relief under the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 – consideration of the appropriate order for costs to take account of the parties' partial success and partial failure in the proceedings – whether issues on which the plaintiff was successful are severable from those on which it was unsuccessful, such that separate costs orders should be made on each issue. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 Cases Cited: Hancock v Rinehart (Costs) [2016] NSWSC 11 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Lord v McMahon [2015] NSWSC 1619 Lord v McMahon (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 1153 Lord v McMahon (No. 3) [2016] NSWSC 1686 Lord v McMahon (No. 4) [2016] NSWSC 1854 Re Estate of Hodges (dec'd): Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 Sze Tu v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 91 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff: Heather Lord Defendant: Stephen McMahon Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: C.A. Vinden Defendant: G. Waugh
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate