NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barakat v R [2017] NSWCCA 147 Hearing dates: 19 June 2017 Date of orders: 21 June 2017 Decision date: 23 June 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Wilson J at [56] Decision: Leave to appeal pursuant to s 5F(3) of the Criminal Appeal Act be refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal by accused under s 5F(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 against refusal of a permanent stay – allegations of irregular and illegal conduct relating to a controlled operation – suggestion that earlier payments made to the informant tainted the investigation and prosecution of drug transactions the applicant was involved in – grounds of appeal unclear – no House v The King error identified – applicant merely sought to re-argue the issue de novo – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) ss 5F(3), 5F(5) Criminal Appeal Rules r 5B Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 138 Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW) s 6 Cases Cited: House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Jago v The District Court New South Wales [1989] HCA 46; 168 CLR 23 R v Ladocki [2004] NSWCCA 336 Ridgeway v The Queen [1995] HCA 66; 184 CLR 19 The Queen v Glennon [1992] HCA 16; 173 CLR 592 TS v R [2014] NSWCCA 174 Walton v Gardiner [1993] HCA 77; 177 CLR 378 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nadar Barakat (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Webb (Applicant) Ms M Cinque SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate