NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Brooks (No.5) [2017] NSWSC 824 Hearing dates: 26 May 2017 Date of orders: 23 June 2017 Decision date: 23 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) Count 2 (wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm), sentenced to a non-parole period of 5 years commencing on 6 April 2015 and expiring on 5 April 2020 with a balance of term of 2½ years commencing on 6 April 2020 and expiring on 5 October 2022. (2) Count 1 (murder), sentenced to a non-parole period of 12½ years to commence on 6 April 2017 and to expire on 5 October 2029 with a balance of term of 7½ years commencing 6 October 2029 and expiring on 5 April 2037. (3) The offender is eligible for release to parole at the conclusion of the non-parole period. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – murder – single stab wound – wounding with intent – second victim stabbed in course of same incident – where jury rejected self-defence – whether offender intended to kill – devastating impact on victim's family – criminal law a blunt tool – sentence and remarks incapable of providing comfort to victims – young offender with no criminal history – no planning or premeditation – no intent to kill – good prospects of rehabilitation – competing purposes of punishment – deterrence important when offender carrying a knife – vindication of dignity of separate victims requiring some accumulation – where conduct of trial facilitates course of justice – consideration of sentences in other cases – need for consistency – need for individual justice – "if justice is not individual, it is nothing" Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Beldon v R [2012] NSWCCA 194 Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525; [1990] HCA 18 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 KT v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 51; (2008) 182 A Crim R 571 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 MB v R [2013] NSWCCA 254 Melbourne v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 32 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Munda v State of Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600; [2013] HCA 38 R v AJC [2010] NSWCCA 168; (2010) 207 A Crim R 307 R v Anthony Jones [2012] NSWSC 1433 R v Boshevski [2011] VSC 303 R v Carr [2009] NSWSC 995 R v Dang [1999] NSWCCA 42 R v Do (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 512 R v Douglas Edwin Barlow [2013] NSWSC 217 R v Halloun [2014] NSWSC 1705 R v Hearne [2001] NSWCCA 37 (2001) 124 A Crim R 451 R v Heffernan [2005] NSWSC 739 R v Hines (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1273 R v James [2013] NSWSC 1560 R v Lattouf (CCA (NSW), 12 December 1996, unrep) R v Lee [2010] NSWSC 632 R v Morris [2017] NSWSC 637 R v Perkins [2016] NSWSC 1080 R v PO [2017] NSWSC 757 R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 R v Quinn (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 1699 R v Saleib [2005] NSWCCA 85 R v Scott (No 6) [2015] NSWSC 678 R v Sumpton (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 684 R v TNV [2014] NSWSC 1510 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 112 R v Wong [2010] NSWSC 171 Simic v R (1980) 144 CLR 319; [1980] HCA 25 Sumpton v R [2016] NSWCCA 162 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Versluys v R [2014] NSWCCA 98 Wilson v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 313; [1992] HCA 31 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina Bradley Brooks Representation: Counsel: Huw Baker (Crown) Andrew Boe (B Brooks)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate