NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Optus Administration Pty Limited v Glenn Wright by his tutor James Stuart Wright (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 154 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 23 June 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Hoeben JA at [2]; Gleeson JA at [3] Decision: (1) Judgment for the appellant against the second respondent for $94,431.03 with effect from 24 May 2017.
(2) Each party to pay its costs of the motion of 9 March 2017. Catchwords: RESTITUTION – other matters – recovery of money paid under judgment or order – where money paid by appellant pursuant to declaration by primary judge that appellant must indemnify second respondent under Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151Z(1)(d) – where declaration is set aside on appeal – where restitution not sought in notice of appeal or at the hearing – whether appropriate to deny interest in the present case.
PROCEDURE – where appellant seeks a further order for restitution of moneys paid under a declaration which is set aside on appeal – where appellant failed to claim restitution in the notice of appeal or at the hearing of the appeal – where omission to claim restitution was an oversight by the appellant's lawyers – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.19.
COSTS – restitution and interest on moneys paid under a judgment later set aside – where relief not sought in notice of appeal or at the hearing – appropriate order for costs of later application for restitution – where appellant seeks an indulgence and respondent to motion had no basis to oppose the making of an order for restitution. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(10) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.7(1), 42.1, 51.19, 51.54 Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151Z(1)(d) Cases Cited: Barrak Corporation Pty Ltd v Jaswil Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 149 Boral Limited v Foley & Bear Pty Ltd t/as J&R Industries (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 108 Cai v Zheng (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 317 Heydon v NRMA Ltd (No 2) (2001) 53 NSWLR 600; [2001] NSWCA 445 Optus Administration Pty Limited v Glenn Wright by his tutor James Stuart Wright [2017] NSWCA 21 Perisher Blue Pty Ltd v Vidakovic (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 326 Production Spray Painting & Panel Beating Pty Ltd v Newnham (No 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 659 TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Antoniadis (No 2) (1999) 48 NSWLR 381; [1999] NSWCA 104 Woolworths Limited v Strong (No 2) (2011) 80 NSWLR 445; [2011] NSWCA 72 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Optus Administration Pty Limited (Appellant) Glenn Wright by his tutor James Stuart Wright (First Respondent) IPA Personnel Pty Limited (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: GM Watson SC / DF Villa (Appellant) L Morgan (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate