NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gooley v NSW Rural Assistance Authority [2017] NSWSC 835 Hearing dates: 24 March 2017 Decision date: 23 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) The summons of 20 December 2016 is dismissed. (2) The plaintiffs, Mr Paul Gooley and Mrs Susan Gooley, must pay the costs of the defendant, George & Fuhrmann (Holdings) Pty Ltd, of the proceedings before me. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – summons seeking judicial review – certificate issued pursuant to Farm Debt Mediation Act 1994 (NSW) – deed of settlement and release – judgment entered in District Court of New South Wales – whether enforcement by way of a garnishee order contravened the Act – whether certificate invalid – summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Farm Debt Mediation Act 1994 (NSW), ss 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.7, 39.34 Cases Cited: Bratic v Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales [2010] NSWSC 1244 Heywood v Sharpe (No 2) [2015] FCCA 355 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82; [2000] HCA 57 Waller v Hargraves Secured Investments Ltd (2012) 245 CLR 311; [2012] HCA 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Gooley (First Plaintiff) Susan Gooley (Second Plaintiff) NSW Rural Assistance Authority (First Defendant) George & Fuhrmann (Holdings) Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P King with T Davy (Plaintiffs) J Emmett (First Defendant) C Simpson (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate