NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lukic v de Luca-Leonard (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 841 Hearing dates: 20 & 22 June 2017 Date of orders: 23 June 2017 Decision date: 23 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) Order pursuant to s 728(1)(a) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 that the defendant provide to the plaintiff a bill of costs in itemised form of costs and disbursements in respect of the legal services provided by the defendant to the plaintiff in connection with the plaintiff's claim for work injury damages. (2) Reserve costs of the plaintiff's application pending final submissions. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – request for an itemised bill of costs and client file – where plaintiff is not required to provide a reason for the request – whether any discretionary considerations apply – whether the application is an abuse of process Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Lukic v de Luca-Leonard [2017] NSWSC 814 Yang v Stephen Paul Firth trading as Firths The Compensation Lawyers [2013] NSWSC 676 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Miroslavka Lukic (Plaintiff) Moya Regina de Luca-Leonard (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: H W M Stitt (Plaintiff) J O'Sullivan (Defendant)
Solicitors: Wilson Fox Lawyers (Plaintiff) Bruce Macdonald Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/357460 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate