NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bridge v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 848 Hearing dates: 23 June 2017 Date of orders: 23 June 2017 Decision date: 23 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: Notice of Motion dismissed Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings – application for leave to file cross-claim – where cross-claim raises new issues – case management principles – orders previously made as to filing dates – previous opportunities to file cross-claim – previous disavowal of reliance on cross-claim – where issues in cross-claim able to be litigated in separate proceedings – where hearing date imminent – where cross-claim would require vacation of hearing date
COSTS – notice of motion dismissed – whether moving party liable for costs – where plaintiff not a respondent to proposed cross-claim – whether interest in retaining hearing date justifies costs order Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2001 (NSW) s 5D Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 9.1 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Larry Kenneth Bridge (Plaintiff) Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Canzon Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: I Roberts SC (Plaintiff) D Priestly SC (First Defendant) D A Lloyd (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate