NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Bugmy [2017] NSWSC 855 Hearing dates: 14-15 June 2017 Decision date: 29 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fullerton J Decision: Extended supervision order imposed for a period of 2 years. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER - final hearing - application for extended supervision order – whether extended supervision order should be made – whether the duration proposed by the plaintiff and proposed conditions were appropriate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 33(1)(b) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General for NSW v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Lynn v State of NSW (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 R v Bugmy (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 322 State of New South Wales v Anderson [2015] NSWSC 1515 State of New South Wales v Bugmy (Preliminary) [2017] NSWSC 333 State of New South Wales v Burns [2014] NSWSC 1014 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWSC 1254 State of New South Wales v Green (Final) [2013] NSWSC 1003 Wilde v State of NSW [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) William David Bugmy (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Callan (Plaintiff) P Skinner (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Legal Aid NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2017/39221
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate