NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jaron Holdings Pty Limited v Amaca Pty Limited [2017] NSWDDT 4 Hearing dates: 1 June 2017 Date of orders: 09 June 2017 Decision date: 09 June 2017 Before: Judge D. Russell Decision: 1 Order the plaintiff to pay the defendant $214,804.48.
2 Direct the parties to file written submissions on the question of costs of the motion as follows:
(a) the defendant's submissions to be filed and served within 14 days of the date of delivery of this judgment;
(b) the plaintiff's submissions in reply to be filed and served within a further 14 days;
(c) the defendant's submissions in reply to be filed within a further 7 days.
3 Reserve the question of costs of the motion to be dealt with by a further judgment after receipt of the written submissions as set out above. Catchwords: DUST DISEASES - contribution - monies paid under compulsion after a Contributions Assessment determination – whether payee should pay interest upon principal amount when payer obtains a better result – restitution Legislation Cited: Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2013; Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946; Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007; Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Commonwealth of Australia v McCormack [1984] HCA 57; (1984) 155 CLR 273 James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Seltsam Pty Ltd [1998] HCA 78; (1998) 196 CLR 53 MPB (SA) Pty Limited v Gogic [1991] HCA 3; (1991) 171 CLR 657 Pavey & Matthews Pty Limited v Paul [1987] HCA 5; (1987) 162 CLR 221 Power Technologies Pty Limited v Energy Australia [2010] NSWCA 107 Production Spray Painting v Newnham (No. 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 659 Texts Cited: Mason & Carter's Restitution Law in Australia, 3rd edition, LexisNexis, 2016 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Jaron Holdings Pty Limited (plaintiff); Amaca Pty Limited (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Sheller appeared for the applicant/defendant; Mr D Toomey SC appeared for the respondent/plaintiff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate