NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Boyd v R (No. 3) [2017] NSWSC 863 Hearing dates: 9 December 2016 Date of orders: 30 June 2017 Decision date: 30 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Johnson J Decision: The application to determine the Applicant's life sentences is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for determination of five life sentences imposed in 1985 - consideration of applicable statutory factors - offences held to be in worst category and involving great heinousness - sexual sadism involved in murder of three women and attempted murder of a fourth - four counts of murder and one of wounding with intent to murder – offences committed over seven-month period in 1982-1983 - Applicant has no real insight into offending - now 61 years old - consequence of refusal of application is that Applicant will remain in prison for the term of his natural life - application refused Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Life Sentences) Act 2008 Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: Boyd v R [2016] NSWSC 1691 Boyd v R (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 1755 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Pollock v R [2007] NSWSC 148 R v Boyd (1995) 81 A Crim R 260 R v Denyer (1995) 1 VR 186 R v Glen [2005] NSWSC 1093 R v Glen [2006] NSWCCA 153 R v Harris (2005) 50 NSWLR 409; [2005] NSWCCA 469 R v Hitchins (unreported, Grove J, 3 June 1993) R v Kilic (2016) 91 ALJR 131; [2016] HCA 48 R v Loveridge (2014) 243 A Crim R 31; [2014] NSWCCA 120 R v Lyttle (unreported, Newman J, 6 March 1996) R v McCafferty (unreported, Wood J, 15 December 1991) R v Rees (unreported, Smart J, 12 August 1993) R v Turner (unreported, Wood J, 20 August 1992) R v Wade [2013] NSWSC 1092 Van der Baan v R [2012] NSWCCA 5 Texts Cited: Ware and Marshall, "Treatment Engagement With A Sexual Offender Who Denies Committing the Offence" Ware, Marshall and Marshall, "Categorical Denial in Convicted Sex Offenders: The Concept, its Meaning and its Implications for Risk and Treatment" Category: Principal judgment Parties: Samuel Leonard Boyd (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr PM Strickland SC (Applicant) Mr H Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate