NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CTS v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 217 Hearing dates: 15 June 2017 Date of orders: 30 June 2017 Decision date: 30 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Decision: The decision of the NSW Trustee and Guardian made on 2 August 2016 that a surety bond should apply to CTS's wife's estate is set aside. Catchwords: STATUTES – acts of parliament – statutory powers and duties – NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 - where NSW Trustee and Guardian required a manager to purchase a surety bond in respect of his wife's estate – whether NSW Trustee and Guardian has power to require a manager to give security to the NSW Trustee and Guardian in respect of the management of an estate Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW), s 63 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), 64 Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), s 25E, s 25M Guardianship and Protected Estates Legislation Amendment Act 2002 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 33 NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW), ss 10, 19, 38, 39, 40, 64, 65, 66, 68, 71 and 86 Public Interest Disclosures Act 1994 (NSW), s 11(2) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 76 r 13 (repealed). Cases Cited: CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384 CTS v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 119 Hamzy v Commissioner of Corrective Services (NSW) [2011] NSWSC 120 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Re Application for Partial Management Orders [2014] NSWSC 1468 Re McL. [2001] NSWSC 280 Re W and L (Parameters of Protected Estate Management Orders) [2014] NSWSC 1106 Refrigerated Express Lines (Australasia) Pty Ltd v Australian Meat and Livestock Corporation (1980) 29 ALR 333 Rodriguez v United States [1987] USSC 36; 480 US 522 (1987) SLJ v RTJ [2017] NSWSC 137 Victims Compensation Fund Corporation v Brown [2002] NSWCA 155; (2002) 54 NSWLR 668 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CTS (Applicant) NSW Trustee and Guardian (Respondent) Representation: CTS (self-represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate