NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Byers v Frith (No 2) [2017] NSWDC 165 Hearing dates: 29, 30, 31 August; 1, 2, 5, 6, 15 and 16 September 2016 Date of orders: 29 June 2017 Decision date: 29 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendants. (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs. Catchwords: MERCANTILE – aircraft accident – seaplane – landing gear - causation - breach of implied statutory warranties – consumer guarantees - "fitness for purpose" – "merchantable quality" – "acceptable quality" – "manufacturer" – "assembles goods" – damages – foreign currency payments Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, Pt 5-4, Div 2, s 7, s 54, s 55, s 140 Evidence Act 1995, s 64 Sale of Goods Act 1896 (Qld), s 17 Cases Cited: Australian Knitting Mills Ltd v Grant (1933) 50 CLR 387 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Daewoo Australia Pty Ltd v Suncorp-Metway Ltd [2000] NSWSC 35; (2000) 48 NSWLR 692 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd (1935) 54 CLR 49 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Who Ya Gonna Call Bark Busters Pty Ltd v Brooke [2013] NSWDC 133 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, Trade practices law: competition and consumer law (Law Book, 2012) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Malcolm Byers (plaintiff) Jan Frith (first defendant) Kelvin Hutchinson (second defendant) Vision In Action Pty Ltd (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A J McInerney SC with Mr D Robertson (plaintiff) Mr R Potter (first defendant) Mr A d'Arville (second and third defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate