NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Van Gorp v Davy [2017] NSWCA 167 Hearing dates: 6 July 2017 Date of orders: 06 July 2017 Decision date: 06 July 2017 Before: McColl JA at [1] and [29] White JA at [27] Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – leave to appeal – where primary judge dismissed applicant's case on grounds of insufficient evidence due to his failure to appear – where non-appearance said to be due to illness – alleged illness not communicated to primary judge – alternative remedy available – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 29.7(2), 29.7(4), 36.16(2)(b) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWCA 206 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Michail v Mount Druitt & Area Community Legal Centre Inc [2015] NSWCA 396 NAKX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1559 Spies v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691 Van Gorp v Davy (2014/175601) Van Gorp v Davy (2015/331605) Van Gorp v Davy [2016] FCA 1385 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sean Cornelius Van Gorp (Applicant) Kate Louise Davy (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) D O'Sullivan (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate