NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RinRim Pty Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG [2017] NSWCA 169 Hearing dates: 6 and 7 June 2017 Decision date: 12 July 2017 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Payne JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [9] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – new argument raised on appeal – whether appellant should be permitted to depart on appeal from approach taken at trial – prejudice to respondents
TORTS – negligence – causation – large shareholder claims that underwriter's negligence caused it loss by failing to make it aware that it could seek acceleration into an Institutional Offer and renounce its entitlement – whether primary Judge erred to find that shareholder would not have sought acceleration in any event
TORTS – duty of care – whether company and underwriters involved in an Accelerated Renounceable Entitlement Offer (AREO) owed a duty of care to a large shareholder to inform it that it could seek acceleration into the first stage of the AREO in order to renounce its entitlement Legislation Cited: Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Ch 6D Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52
Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5A(1), 5D, 5E Cases Cited: Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 (2014) 254 CLR 185; [2014] HCA 36 Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609; [1995] HCA 17 Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd v Stavar (2009) 75 NSWLR 649; [2009] NSWCA 258 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1997) 47 NSWLR 631 Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180; [1999] HCA 36 RinRim Pty Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG [2016] NSWSC 1377; 115 ACSR 236 RinRim Pty Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG (Costs) [2016] NSWSC 1510 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418; [1950] HCA 35 Tal Life Ltd v Shuetrim (2016) 91 NSWLR 439; [2016] NSWCA 68 Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375; [2013] HCA 19 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491; [1988] HCA 12 Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 515; [2004] HCA 16 Texts Cited: ASX Listing Rules Category: Principal judgment Parties: RinRim Pty Ltd (Appellant) Deutsche Bank AG (First Respondent) Credit Suisse (Australia) Limited (Second Respondent) CIMB Capital Markets (Australia) Limited (Third Respondent) Primary Health Care Limited (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Einfeld QC / Mr A Russoniello (Appellant) Dr A Bell SC / Mr A Shearer (First, Second and Third Respondents) Mr IM Jackman SC / Mr DFC Thomas (Fourth Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate