NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ACN 151 368 124 v Pro-Pac Packaging (Aust) Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 913 Hearing dates: 26/06/2016, 27/06/2017 and 28/06/2017 Date of orders: 30 June 2017 Decision date: 30 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McDougall J Decision: Separate questions answered as set out at [102]. Catchwords: CONTRACT – whether side letter had contractual effect – where no consideration – CONTRACT – whether representation had contractual effect – CONSUMER LAW – whether representation misleading and deceptive – where representation was not relied on – CONTRACT – whether estoppel defence available Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Co-operative Foods Ltd v Norco Co-operative (1990) 46 NSWLR 267 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 Golden Horizon Finance Co Ltd v Financial & Energy Exchange Limited [2016] NSWSC 593 Hoyt's Ltd v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133 Johnson Matthey Ltd v AC Rochester Overseas (1990) 23 NSWLR 190 Taylor v The Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 253 CLR 531 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Whittet v State Bank of New South Wales (1991) 24 NSWLR 146 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ACN 151 368 124 formerly Eco Food Pack Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Pro-Pac Packaging (AUST) Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M R Pesman SC/ A D Crossland (Plaintiff) S Duggan (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate