NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Cardinal Project Services Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 920 Hearing dates: Tuesday, 27 June 2017 Date of orders: 12 July 2017 Decision date: 12 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Application for review of liquidators' remuneration dismissed Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – external administration – liquidation – liquidator's remuneration – voluntary winding up – where approval for further remuneration set aside but liquidators have approved remuneration for entire liquidation – where liquidators have undertaken substantial work in excess of approval if costed according to time spent – where court satisfied that liquidators would be entitled to not less than remuneration so far approved – no warrant for review
CIVIL PROCEDURE – stay of proceedings – inherent power – abuse of process – collateral abuse of process Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 473(10), s 504 (CTH) Corporations Regulations 2001, reg 5.6.26(3) (NSW) Evidence Act 1995, s 11(2), s 131(2)(k) Cases Cited: Ashby v Slipper (2014) 219 FCR 322 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Ltd (2011) 198 FCR 297 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2007) 162 FCR 466 Goldsmith v Sperrings Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 478 Holloway v McFeeters (1956) 94 CLR 470 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kennards Hire Pty Ltd v RMGA Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1387 Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Morgan [2009] NSWSC 1222; (2009) 76 ACSR 26 Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Morgan [2010] NSWCA 217; (2010) 79 ACSR 580 Petrolink Pty Ltd, In the matter of; Smith v Boné [2014] FCA 1024 Robinson v Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd [1910] AC 295 Sanderson v Sakr [2017] NSWCA 38 Van Der Lee v New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 286 Varawa v Howard Smith Co Ltd (1911) 13 CLR 35 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Melrose Cranes & Rigging Pty Limited (plaintiff) Richard Stone (first defendant) Peter William Marsden (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Spencer (plaintiff) F Assaf (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate