NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: George v City of Parramatta Council [2017] NSWLEC 1366 Hearing dates: 5 & 6 July 2017 Date of orders: 14 July 2017 Decision date: 14 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson, C Decision: The orders of the Court are: 1. The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans; 2. The appeal is dismissed; 3. Development application DA 839/2016 for demolition of existing carport and outbuildings, removal of trees and construction of a residential flat building to the rear of two existing heritage items, proposed at 65-71 Boundary Street Granville is refused. 4. The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits 1, A and G Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL: against refusal of residential flat building – permissibility relies on conservation incentives - appropriateness of the impact on the existing heritage – finding of adverse impact on heritage significance. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy 65: Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development Cases Cited: David Fox v North Sydney Council [2016] NSWLEC 1366 Texts Cited: Apartment Design Guide. The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance Assessing Heritage Significance, NSW Heritage Office Category: Principal judgment Parties: Norm George (First Applicant) Nadia George (Second Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate