NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hanna v R [2017] NSWCCA 168 Hearing dates: 7 July 2017 Decision date: 20 July 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Harrison J at [19]; Schmidt J at [57] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal against sentence – plea of guilty –armed robbery contrary to s 97(1) Crimes Act 1900 –whether incompetence of counsel led sentencing proceedings to miscarry
APPEAL – criminal – evidence – challenge to competence of counsel – admissibility of evidence as to instructions – role of counsel – whether test of miscarriage depends on objective circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 97 Cases Cited: Ahmu v R; Director of Public Prosecutions v Ahmu [2014] NSWCCA 312 John Wayne Tsiakis v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Matthews v R [2013] NSWCCA 187 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; 80 ALJR 614 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Vella v R; Siskos v R [2015] NSWCCA 148 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nazih Hanna (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Finnane QC (Applicant) D Kell SC & M Pulsford (Crown)
Solicitors: Oxford Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2013/18142 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 1 July 2015 Before: Colefax SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/18142
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate