NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Huang v Drumm [2017] NSWSC 949 Hearing dates: 14 July 2017 Decision date: 14 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Refuse leave to the plaintiff to appeal against the decision of Barnett LCM dismissing the plaintiff's application for leave for a subpoena to be issued to Mr Kumar. 2. Order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings in this Court. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for appeal against interlocutory decision of the Local Court – whether leave should be granted to appeal against magistrate's decision to refuse application for leave to issue subpoena – HELD – leave refused – no issue of principle – no injustice shown – no error identified in magistrate's exercise of discretion to refuse issue of subpoena on sixth day of hearing Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 103 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 40 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.3 Cases Cited: Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWCA 206 Hession v Century 21 South Pacific Ltd (in liq) (1992) 28 NSWLR 120 Liristis v Gadelrabb [2009] NSWSC 441 Toppro Pty Ltd v Yoo [2016] NSWCA 119 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Biru Huang (Plaintiff) Bernard Joseph Drumm as trustee for the Corporate Consulting Services Trust (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff in person D Elliot (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate