NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Donohoe v R [2017] NSWCCA 174 Hearing dates: 30 June 2017 Decision date: 21 July 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Fullerton J at [2] Garling J at [108] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against the conviction on all grounds except Ground 1 (in part) granted. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – sexual offences against three cognitively impaired complainants – thirteen counts – whether evidence of complainants was unreliable - whether conduct of trial was unfair – tendency evidence – implied admission - no error in trial judge's analysis of the evidence, findings of fact or application of the law – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bryant v R [2011] NSWCCA 26 CR v R [2017] NSWCCA 29 DJW v R [2015] NSWCCA 164 Hughes v R [2017] HCA 20 Kelly v R (2004) 218 CLR 216; [2004] HCA 12 Mackenzie v R (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 Mcintosh v R [2015] NSWCCA 184 Nguyen V R [2017] NSWCCA 145 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Donohoe (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Hughes (Crown)
Solicitors: In person (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2014/273144 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 23 November 2015 Before: Williams ADCJ File Number(s): 2014/273144
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate