NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Grafil Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v Mackenzie [2017] NSWLEC 88 Hearing dates: 22 June 2017 Date of orders: 21 July 2017 Decision date: 21 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Preston CJ Decision: The Court orders that the motion is dismissed. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – privilege – legal professional privilege – documents produced under subpoena by expert witnesses in prosecution – prosecutor claimed privilege over and objected to access being given to privileged documents – defendants seek access to subpoenaed documents – whether privilege claim and objection to access determined under Evidence Act 1995 or common law – whether documents privileged – whether privilege waived – privilege claim upheld and access not granted Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 ss 118, 119, 126A, 126B, 131A Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 144 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 1.9; 33.8 Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd (2009) 174 FCR 547; [2007] FCAFC 32 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australian Lending Centre Pty Ltd (No 2) (2011) 283 ALR 299; [2011] FCA 1057 Buzzle Operations Pty Ltd (in liq) v Apple Computer Australia Pty Ltd (2009) 74 NSWLR 469; [2009] NSWSC 225 Carbotech – Australia Pty Ltd v Yates [2008] NSWSC 1151 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 201 CLR 49; [1999] HCA 67 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 National Employers' Mutual General Association v Waind and Hill [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 New Cap Reinsurance Corp Ltd (in liq) v Renaissance Reinsurance Ltd [2007] NSWSC 258 Ritz Hotel Ltd v Charles of the Ritz Ltd [No 22] (1988) 14 NSWLR 132 State of New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation [2011] NSWCA 60 Styles v Clayton Utz [2011] NSWSC 1314 Tavcol Pty Ltd v Valbeet Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1002 Towney v Minister for Land and Water Conservation (NSW) (1997) 76 FCR 401 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 Traderight (NSW) Pty Limited v Bank of Queensland [2013] NSWSC 211 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Environment Protection Authority v Grafil Pty Ltd Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Grafil Pty Ltd (Defendant) Environment Protection Authority v Robert Mackenzie Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Robert Mackenzie (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Rushton SC and Mr P English (Prosecutor) Mr CR Ireland (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate